Anand, N., Gardner, H. K., & Morris, T. (2007). Knowledge-based innovation: Emergence and embedding of new practice areas in management consulting firms. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 406–428.
Barley, S. R. (1986). Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(1), 78–108.
Barley, S. R. (1990). Images of imaging: Notes on doing longitudinal field work. Organization Science, 1(3), 220–247. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1.3.220
Becker, H. S. (1993). How I learned what a crock was. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 22(1), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124193022001003
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook 1 Cognitive domain. New York: Longmans.
Breuer, F., & Schreier, M. (2007). Issues in learning about and teaching qualitative research methods and methodology in the social sciences. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 8(1). Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/216
Brown, A. D., Colville, I., & Pye, A. (2015). Making sense of sensemaking in Organization Studies. Organization Studies, 36(2), 265–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840614559259
Daudelin, M. W. (1996). Learning from experience through reflection. Organizational Dynamics, 24(3), 36–48. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/s0090-2616(96)90004-2
Denzin, N. K. (1987). On semiotics and symbolic interactionism. Symbolic Interaction, 10(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.19126.96.36.199
Gehman, J., Glaser, V. L., Eisenhardt, K. M., Gioia, D., Langley, A., & Corley, K. G. (2017). Finding theory–method fit: A comparison of three qualitative approaches to theory building. Journal of Management Inquiry, 1056492617706029. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492617706029
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
Gioia, D. A., & Thomas, J. B. (1996). Identity, image, and issue interpretation: Sensemaking during strategic change in academia. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(3), 370–403. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393936
Guiding principles for conducting research with human participants. (2013). The Univesity of Auckland. Retrieved from https://www.auckland.ac.nz/en/about/research/re-ethics/re-uahpec.html
Haynes, K. (2012). Reflexivity in qualitative research. In G. Symon & C. Cassell (Eds.), Qualitative organizational research: Core methods and current challenges (pp. 72–89). London: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Hibbert, P., Coupland, C., & MacIntosh, R. (2010). Reflexivity: Recursion and relationality in organizational research processes. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 5(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465641011042026
Huff, A. S. (2009). Designing research for publication. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
James, R., McInnis, C., & Devlin, M. (2002). Assessing learning in Australian universities: Ideas, strategies and resources for quality in student assessment. Center for the study for higher education. Retrieved from http://www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/assessinglearning/docs/AssessingLearning.pdf
Jarzabkowski, P. A., Bednarek, R., & Cabantous, L. (2015). Conducting global team-based ethnography: Methodological challenges and practical methods. Human Relations, 68(1), 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726714535449
Jarzabkowski, P. A., Bednarek, R., & Lê, J. (2014). Producing persuasive findings: Demystifying ethnographic textwork in strategy and organization research. Strategic Organization, 12(4), 274–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127014554575
Myers, M. D. (1994). A disaster for everyone to see: An interpretive analysis of a failed is project. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 4(4), 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-8022(94)90022-1
Novak, J. D., & Cañas, A. J. (2006). The origins of the concept mapping tool and the continuing evolution of the tool. Information Visualization, 5(3), 175–184. https://doi.org/10/cznd67
Payne, G., & Payne, J. (2004). Reflexivity. In Key concepts in social research (pp. 191–195). London: SAGE Publications, Ltd. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781849209397.n4
Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. (1994). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Qualitative research in business & management. (2013) (2nd. ed.). London: SAGE.
Schatzki, T. R., Knorr Cetina, K., & Savigny, E. von. (2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory. New York: Routledge. Retrieved from http://site.ebrary.com.ezproxy.auckland.ac.nz/lib/auckland/docDetail.action?docID=10095826
Schunk, D. H. (2005). Self-regulated learning: The educational legacy of Paul R. Pintrich. Educational Psychologist, 40(2), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4002_3
Sensemaking in organizations. (1995). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Smets, M., Jarzabkowski, P., Burke, G. T., & Spee, P. (2015). Reinsurance trading in Lloyd’s of London: Balancing conflicting-yet-complementary logics in practice. Academy of Management Journal, 58(3), 932–970. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0638
The awaking giant. (1985). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. (1967). Chicago: Adeline.
The qualitative researcher’s companion. (2002). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Urquhart, C. (2017). Grounded theory for qualitative research: A practical guide. 55 City Road, London. Retrieved from http://methods.sagepub.com/book/grounded-theory-for-qualitative-research
Wang, J., & Yan, Y. (2017). The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft. In pages 231-242 (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc. Retrieved from http://methods.sagepub.com/book/handbook-of-interview-research-2e